Basic  /  Detailed
Export:
Pos Team P W L D B F A SD S% Pts
1 Hampton (2) 2 2 0 0 0 168 149 19 112.75 30
2 Cheltenham (3) 2 2 0 0 0 149 134 15 111.19 24
3 Bentleigh (3) 2 1 1 0 0 159 135 24 117.78 20
4 SOC (1) 2 1 1 0 0 171 159 12 107.55 20
5 Hampton RSL (1) 2 1 1 0 0 153 149 4 102.68 20
6 Sandringham (1) 2 1 1 0 0 158 150 8 105.33 18
7 Clayton (3) 2 1 1 0 0 159 153 6 103.92 18
8 Mulgrave CC (5) 2 1 1 0 0 142 183 -41 77.6 14
9 Beaumaris (3) 2 0 2 0 0 135 153 -18 88.24 10
10 Brighton (2) 2 0 2 0 0 142 171 -29 83.04 6

Ranking Method: Points - Score Difference - Shots Percentage

Legend
P Played
W Won
L Loss
D Draw
B Bye
F Score For
A Score Against
SD Score Difference
S% Shots Percentage
Pts Points